So SCOTUS has a double standard. When it comes to abortion rights, gay marriage rights, etc. they claim that the Constitution should be interpreted as the authors thought back in the 18th century.

If that is true, then the Second Amendment should be interpreted as only applying to arms that the authors were familiar with: knives, swords, flintlock pistols and muskets.

Using that interpretation (as SCOTUS insists we must), no one has a consitutional right to assault weapons, long guns and handguns.

Sorry, but you can't have it both ways.

And I have kept up with the news because the decisions you mention directly affect me as a NJ resident.